Round Table Talk of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference “Cognitive Studies: Cognitive Science and Cognitive Psychology”
Abstract
Abstract
The article presents a discussion of the results of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference “Cognitive Studies”: Cognitive Science and Cognitive Psychology, which took place on May 25–26, 2023 (Minsk, 2023). The conference is a continuation of a series of scientific meetings on cognitive science that are regularly held in the Republic of Belarus. The purpose of “Cognitive Studies” was to organize a forum for specialists in fields studying cognition and its evolution, intelligence, thinking, perception, consciousness, representation and acquisition of knowledge, language as a means of cognition and communication, brain mechanisms of cognition and complex forms of behavior.
Introduction
Conference is the main impression from Belarus
Chernyavskaya V.S.
On May 25, 2023, a round table “Cognitive Studies: perspectives for cooperation” was held within the framework of the conference [1, 2, 3]. It was attended by the members of the program committee and the authors of the plenary speeches, scientists representing universities of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation [2, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The round table was initiated by the Vice-rector for scientific work of the Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maksim Tank (BGPU), Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor A.V. Poznyak. The session was conducted by two co-hosts: N.V. Drozdova, director of the Institute of psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University, candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor, and A.P. Lobanov, professor of the department of general and organizational psychology, doctor of psychological sciences, professor [1].
А.P. Lobanov: Dear colleagues, I suggest to discuss just three questions: 1) development of cognitive science and cognitive psychology in your country and in your region; 2) what can you say about cognitive psychology in the Republic of Belarus? What are cognitive studies interesting for you; 3) what scientific projects you could realize together with Belarusian State Pedagogical University and the Institute of Psychology in particular? We will stick to the principle of free microphone.
V.A. Yasvin: Let me begin by saying that I do not consider myself a cognitivist…
А.P. Lobanov: Vitold Albertovich, if I may disagree, you are already a cognitive scientist, just like J. Miller, you still do not recognize it, it took him just a little bit, 20 years.
V.A. Yasvin: Well, I’ll say what you’re all gonna refute: I think we’re talking about science as something narrowly focused. It is very important for psychology (and for any science in general) to draw on as wide a field of knowledge as possible. In this sense, I would say that any science should be categorized into problems.
N.V. Drozdova: if we refer to the problems, they were quite unambiguously outlined in Moscow at the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Science at the First National Congress on Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroinformatic. A.P. Lobanov and I also presented the results of a research on oculomotor activity and cognitive learning performance. The binocular equipment “Pupillabseyetracking” (made in Germany), designed for scientific research, was used for evaluation of visual perception of stimulus material; verbal intelligence – the technique “Leading grouping way”. The results of the research confirm the consistency of psychophysiological and psychodiagnostics indicators and the position of the influence of verbal intelligence on the choice of optimal cognitive learning for each group. Respondents with specific verbal intelligence, based on temporal-spatial representations and associative way of grouping, demonstrate more pronounced cognitive rigidity when changing tasks and greater dependence on context. Both Russian and Belarusian researchers, as follows from the materials of the Cognitive Congress, addressed the neural network approach and the problem of consciousness and the brain.
V.S. Chernyavskaya: it seems to me that consciousness and cognitive psychology still diverge in many ways. Cognitive psychology (cognitive processes and neuropsychology) remains on one side, while on the other side is the human being and society, what creates this very consciousness. If they finally diverge, we will not be able to solve the problem. While getting involved in brain research, we should not move away from consciousness.
Е.V. Volkova: it is necessary to create interdisciplinary scientific teams that will deal with one common problem; teams that aim to solve a single problem (like S.P. Korolev’s team). The creation of intercultural teams, because each country has its own specifics. I watched the play in the Belarusian language, watched and understood the essence. At the same time, I watched those who know the Belarusian language and live in Minsk, laughing and feeling the nuances, but not always able to grasp the meaning. Interdisciplinarity and intercultural projects should be present in cognitive science. It is not only an extension of cognition, there is cognition through experience. Take L.V. Zankov’s system, teaching literature as art consists of perception and analysis of this primary holistic emotional-personal relationship to reading. By addressing the emotional-personal relationship to reality, we can learn about the world and what our decisions are based on.
N.P. Radchikova: we need big interdisciplinary and international projects, is there a leader (ideologist) among us. Someone who can put forward a non-trivial hypothesis, who can unite us and become the driving motor of the project. On the side of Belarus, there is Alexander Pavlovich for cognitive psychology. We have a laboratory of experimental psychology, an institute of experimental psychology, and a new center (with necessary equipment, including magnetic encephalography) at the Moscow State Pedagogical University. In the laboratory they can help with the implementation of your ideas, help conduct a hardware experiment. If you wish, we can arrange for cooperation with them.
N.V. Drozdova: we get an idea called cognitive phenomenology of consciousness…
А.P. Lobanov: all that people know is the distorted knowledge of those people who have touched that knowledge. When we create the cult of the philistine, that he is always right, we arrive at implicit theories, naive art, and naive pedagogy. This will devalue our research and hit us. The same thing will happen to us that happened to the teacher, he was once the most literate person, everyone valued him. Others have learned to read and write, and attitudes toward teachers have changed. I am in favor of a cult of professionals who know what they know and teach.
K.V. Karpinsky: Cognitive psychology was, is and remains one of the leading branches of academic psychology and scientific psychology proper. Other branches and major problematic fields of psychology and personality psychology were not immediately mainstreamed. Cognitive psychology conforms to the ideals of scientism and is general scientific in nature; it is more laboratory-based than field-based. It is a science that relies primarily on the experimental method, which is similar to all the other natural sciences. A science which seeks not a descriptive image, but an explanatory knowledge of laws and mechanisms. It tries to objectify its subject and therefore uses instrumental, psychophysiological hardware methods. At present, Belarus does not have all the conditions to “do” cognitive science according to this pattern. It is worth discussing whether it is possible to do cognitive psychology as a science based on the instrumental method, on the questionnaire method, and whether it will correspond to the modern canon of science?
Е.V. Volkova: the most objective method and data we will get, if we will combine Q and L data, that is, we must use the totality of the data, and the use of purely laboratory experiment is fundamentally not transferable to real life [4].
K.V. Karpinsky: my message is that researchers in Belarus are not armed with everything that corresponds to the mainstream of cognitive psychology. Is, psychology as a field science. A science based on multi-method research, not just instrumental research? Belarus has a tradition of studying exactly such ecologically valid studies: the study of cognitive processes in the course of cognition of real and social objects; there are schools of social-perceptual psychology, psychology of self-knowledge, psychology of autobiographical cognition.
А.P. Lobanov: there is no difference between laboratory and field (natural) research only when there is normal equipment; then the line between these two types of experiment is gone. So, the point is not where you do the research, the point is how you conduct it.
О.B. Mikhailova: From everything that has been said here, the center of the problem of cognitive psychology is the living and real personality, not the laboratory personality. The problem of researching living and real personality is the main task of cognitive psychology. This is, for example, about the research on social intelligence. We have dealt with cognitive intelligence. The focus of modern psychology, including cognitive psychology, must nevertheless be on social intelligence. It is important to form a motivational orientation in cognitive intelligence, which would help a person to self-actualize. Unfortunately, for years we have been saying that psychology is not a subject taught in school. If it were, it would focus on the development of social intelligence. Then many of the issues we have raised today could have been addressed.
О.V. Rudykhina: Psychology, like other sciences, develops after the classical stage. This stage of the development of science dictates to us narrow disciplinary canons of research. I agree, hardware methods for diagnosing cognitive traits are important to us, but insufficient. For cognitive psychology to develop even more productively, it is necessary to connect not only the research of the psychophysiological level, but also to pay attention to higher levels of mental organization: the value-motivational sphere, understanding a person as a subject of his life activity. When we investigate a person, when we interact with him in the context of education, for us he is actively involved in his life activity. The level of involvement affects his mental development, including his cognitive development. At our Institute, we analyze the human being in the context of a life path, in the context of a subjective approach. Since last year a master’s program in cognitive psychology has been underway, and hardware methods are actively involved, which can serve as a basis for cooperation. It is important to study the person in the context of the existing reality in the context of digitalization. Modern man is actively exposed to gadgets, has a “digital” experience, and this, of course, should be taken into account when studying his cognitive features.
А.N. Pevneva: Until recently, the development of cognitive science in Belarus was latent and sluggish. However, the materials of publications in scientific journals currently indicate that the cognitive approach in domestic psychology is developing and becoming predominant. Before our eyes there is a significant increase in the quality of publications. Cognitive studies fully demonstrate this trend. Belarusian scientists have an opportunity to get acquainted with breakthrough domestic research in the field of cognitive science. At the same time, close cooperation with Russian colleagues from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences is established to promote cognitive science. The invitation to participate in the conference of employees of the V.N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resources Psychology (for example, M.A. Kholodnaya [5] and E.V. Volkova [4]) promotes joint Russian-Belarusian projects. For example, at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, research of cognitive rigidity using an electroencephalograph and an i-tracker was implemented. For this purpose, specialists from the V.N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resources Psychology and the Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Psychology of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow) were invited. The research was conducted within the framework of the concluded Russian-Belarusian Agreement on International Cooperation (February 2023), to which the Institute of Psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University is planned to join [7].
Perspective of international cooperation is seen not only in the field of education, introduction of new technologies, but primarily through the conclusion of contracts for research, development and technological work (R&D).
А.P. Lobanov: dear colleagues, thank you for your contributions. A common consensus is as unattainable as solving the problem of the square of the circle. We have different scientific interests, different facilities, but we are all united by a common cognitive paradigm and the Minsk venue, which is always open for cooperation and exchange of opinions. The conference continues. There are already first responses. “There were raptures and gratitude. It was fantastic: ideas, humor, diversity. Everything was perfectly organized: clear, smooth and quiet. Thank you very much for your work” (Ph.D. in Psychology, docent Elena Medvedskaya). I could not have said it better.
In the first row from left to right is E. V. Volkova, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the V. N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resource Psychology at the Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, who participated in the conference through the “Visiting Professor” program; Ph.D. in Pedagogy, Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia O. B. Mikhailova; Professor of the Department of General and Organizational Psychology, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor A. P. Lobanov; Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Social Psychology at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno A. N. Pevneva. On the second row is O. V. Rudykhina, Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor at the Department of Human Psychology of the State Pedagogical University of Russia named after A. I. Herzen; Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the PsyDATA Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research at Moscow State Pedagogical University N. P. Radchikova; N. V. Drozdova, director of the Institute of psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University, candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor; Doctor of Psychology, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Interdepartmental Department of Educational Systems and Pedagogical Technologies of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation V. A. Yasvin; Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno K. V. Karpinsky; Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Legal Psychology, Vladivostok State University V. S. Chernyavskaya.
References
1. Lobanov, A.P. & Drozdova, N.P. “Cognitive Studies”, or Welcome to the Cognitive World // Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 13–15.
2. Lobanov, A.P. & Radchikova N.P. (2023). Cognitive studies: cognitive science and cognitive psychology: Collection of materials of the IX international. scientific-practical conf.; Minsk, May 25–26, 2023; edited by A.P. Lobanova, N.P. Radchikova. Minsk: BSPU, 2023. Issue. 9. 1 electron. wholesale disk (CD-ROM).
3. Lobanov, A.P. & Radchikova N.P. (2023). Cognitive psychology in Belarus: memories of the future // Cognitive studies: cognitive science and cognitive psychology: Collection of materials of the IX international. scientific-practical conf.; Minsk, May 25–26, 2023; edited by A.P. Lobanova, N.P. Radchikova. Minsk: BSPU, 2023. – Issue. 9. – 1 electron. wholesale disk (CD-ROM).
4. Volkova, E.V. & Kuvaeva, I.O. (2023). Coping intelligence of a nation and coping intelligence of a subject: research prospects // Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 42–52.
5. Kholodnaya, М. (2023). The multidimensional nature of reflection: the light and dark sides of reflexive regulation // Vesti BDPU. Seryya 1. No. 2. Р. 63–66.
6. Lobanov, A.Р., Drozdova N.V., Kopteva S.I. (2023). Emotional intelligence and fatigue of future professionals in the assisting professions // Vesti BDPU. Seryya 1. No. 2. Р. 59–62
7. Pevneva, A.N. (2023). Cognitive psychophysical patterns of the Stroop effect in the context of the general concept of rigidity// Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 33–42.
Comments (0)
The article presents a discussion of the results of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference “Cognitive Studies”: Cognitive Science and Cognitive Psychology, which took place on May 25–26, 2023 (Minsk, 2023). The conference is a continuation of a series of scientific meetings on cognitive science that are regularly held in the Republic of Belarus. The purpose of “Cognitive Studies” was to organize a forum for specialists in fields studying cognition and its evolution, intelligence, thinking, perception, consciousness, representation and acquisition of knowledge, language as a means of cognition and communication, brain mechanisms of cognition and complex forms of behavior.
Conference is the main impression from Belarus
Chernyavskaya V.S.
On May 25, 2023, a round table “Cognitive Studies: perspectives for cooperation” was held within the framework of the conference [1, 2, 3]. It was attended by the members of the program committee and the authors of the plenary speeches, scientists representing universities of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation [2, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The round table was initiated by the Vice-rector for scientific work of the Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maksim Tank (BGPU), Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor A.V. Poznyak. The session was conducted by two co-hosts: N.V. Drozdova, director of the Institute of psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University, candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor, and A.P. Lobanov, professor of the department of general and organizational psychology, doctor of psychological sciences, professor [1].
А.P. Lobanov: Dear colleagues, I suggest to discuss just three questions: 1) development of cognitive science and cognitive psychology in your country and in your region; 2) what can you say about cognitive psychology in the Republic of Belarus? What are cognitive studies interesting for you; 3) what scientific projects you could realize together with Belarusian State Pedagogical University and the Institute of Psychology in particular? We will stick to the principle of free microphone.
V.A. Yasvin: Let me begin by saying that I do not consider myself a cognitivist…
А.P. Lobanov: Vitold Albertovich, if I may disagree, you are already a cognitive scientist, just like J. Miller, you still do not recognize it, it took him just a little bit, 20 years.
V.A. Yasvin: Well, I’ll say what you’re all gonna refute: I think we’re talking about science as something narrowly focused. It is very important for psychology (and for any science in general) to draw on as wide a field of knowledge as possible. In this sense, I would say that any science should be categorized into problems.
N.V. Drozdova: if we refer to the problems, they were quite unambiguously outlined in Moscow at the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Science at the First National Congress on Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroinformatic. A.P. Lobanov and I also presented the results of a research on oculomotor activity and cognitive learning performance. The binocular equipment “Pupillabseyetracking” (made in Germany), designed for scientific research, was used for evaluation of visual perception of stimulus material; verbal intelligence – the technique “Leading grouping way”. The results of the research confirm the consistency of psychophysiological and psychodiagnostics indicators and the position of the influence of verbal intelligence on the choice of optimal cognitive learning for each group. Respondents with specific verbal intelligence, based on temporal-spatial representations and associative way of grouping, demonstrate more pronounced cognitive rigidity when changing tasks and greater dependence on context. Both Russian and Belarusian researchers, as follows from the materials of the Cognitive Congress, addressed the neural network approach and the problem of consciousness and the brain.
V.S. Chernyavskaya: it seems to me that consciousness and cognitive psychology still diverge in many ways. Cognitive psychology (cognitive processes and neuropsychology) remains on one side, while on the other side is the human being and society, what creates this very consciousness. If they finally diverge, we will not be able to solve the problem. While getting involved in brain research, we should not move away from consciousness.
Е.V. Volkova: it is necessary to create interdisciplinary scientific teams that will deal with one common problem; teams that aim to solve a single problem (like S.P. Korolev’s team). The creation of intercultural teams, because each country has its own specifics. I watched the play in the Belarusian language, watched and understood the essence. At the same time, I watched those who know the Belarusian language and live in Minsk, laughing and feeling the nuances, but not always able to grasp the meaning. Interdisciplinarity and intercultural projects should be present in cognitive science. It is not only an extension of cognition, there is cognition through experience. Take L.V. Zankov’s system, teaching literature as art consists of perception and analysis of this primary holistic emotional-personal relationship to reading. By addressing the emotional-personal relationship to reality, we can learn about the world and what our decisions are based on.
N.P. Radchikova: we need big interdisciplinary and international projects, is there a leader (ideologist) among us. Someone who can put forward a non-trivial hypothesis, who can unite us and become the driving motor of the project. On the side of Belarus, there is Alexander Pavlovich for cognitive psychology. We have a laboratory of experimental psychology, an institute of experimental psychology, and a new center (with necessary equipment, including magnetic encephalography) at the Moscow State Pedagogical University. In the laboratory they can help with the implementation of your ideas, help conduct a hardware experiment. If you wish, we can arrange for cooperation with them.
N.V. Drozdova: we get an idea called cognitive phenomenology of consciousness…
А.P. Lobanov: all that people know is the distorted knowledge of those people who have touched that knowledge. When we create the cult of the philistine, that he is always right, we arrive at implicit theories, naive art, and naive pedagogy. This will devalue our research and hit us. The same thing will happen to us that happened to the teacher, he was once the most literate person, everyone valued him. Others have learned to read and write, and attitudes toward teachers have changed. I am in favor of a cult of professionals who know what they know and teach.
K.V. Karpinsky: Cognitive psychology was, is and remains one of the leading branches of academic psychology and scientific psychology proper. Other branches and major problematic fields of psychology and personality psychology were not immediately mainstreamed. Cognitive psychology conforms to the ideals of scientism and is general scientific in nature; it is more laboratory-based than field-based. It is a science that relies primarily on the experimental method, which is similar to all the other natural sciences. A science which seeks not a descriptive image, but an explanatory knowledge of laws and mechanisms. It tries to objectify its subject and therefore uses instrumental, psychophysiological hardware methods. At present, Belarus does not have all the conditions to “do” cognitive science according to this pattern. It is worth discussing whether it is possible to do cognitive psychology as a science based on the instrumental method, on the questionnaire method, and whether it will correspond to the modern canon of science?
Е.V. Volkova: the most objective method and data we will get, if we will combine Q and L data, that is, we must use the totality of the data, and the use of purely laboratory experiment is fundamentally not transferable to real life [4].
K.V. Karpinsky: my message is that researchers in Belarus are not armed with everything that corresponds to the mainstream of cognitive psychology. Is, psychology as a field science. A science based on multi-method research, not just instrumental research? Belarus has a tradition of studying exactly such ecologically valid studies: the study of cognitive processes in the course of cognition of real and social objects; there are schools of social-perceptual psychology, psychology of self-knowledge, psychology of autobiographical cognition.
А.P. Lobanov: there is no difference between laboratory and field (natural) research only when there is normal equipment; then the line between these two types of experiment is gone. So, the point is not where you do the research, the point is how you conduct it.
О.B. Mikhailova: From everything that has been said here, the center of the problem of cognitive psychology is the living and real personality, not the laboratory personality. The problem of researching living and real personality is the main task of cognitive psychology. This is, for example, about the research on social intelligence. We have dealt with cognitive intelligence. The focus of modern psychology, including cognitive psychology, must nevertheless be on social intelligence. It is important to form a motivational orientation in cognitive intelligence, which would help a person to self-actualize. Unfortunately, for years we have been saying that psychology is not a subject taught in school. If it were, it would focus on the development of social intelligence. Then many of the issues we have raised today could have been addressed.
О.V. Rudykhina: Psychology, like other sciences, develops after the classical stage. This stage of the development of science dictates to us narrow disciplinary canons of research. I agree, hardware methods for diagnosing cognitive traits are important to us, but insufficient. For cognitive psychology to develop even more productively, it is necessary to connect not only the research of the psychophysiological level, but also to pay attention to higher levels of mental organization: the value-motivational sphere, understanding a person as a subject of his life activity. When we investigate a person, when we interact with him in the context of education, for us he is actively involved in his life activity. The level of involvement affects his mental development, including his cognitive development. At our Institute, we analyze the human being in the context of a life path, in the context of a subjective approach. Since last year a master’s program in cognitive psychology has been underway, and hardware methods are actively involved, which can serve as a basis for cooperation. It is important to study the person in the context of the existing reality in the context of digitalization. Modern man is actively exposed to gadgets, has a “digital” experience, and this, of course, should be taken into account when studying his cognitive features.
А.N. Pevneva: Until recently, the development of cognitive science in Belarus was latent and sluggish. However, the materials of publications in scientific journals currently indicate that the cognitive approach in domestic psychology is developing and becoming predominant. Before our eyes there is a significant increase in the quality of publications. Cognitive studies fully demonstrate this trend. Belarusian scientists have an opportunity to get acquainted with breakthrough domestic research in the field of cognitive science. At the same time, close cooperation with Russian colleagues from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences is established to promote cognitive science. The invitation to participate in the conference of employees of the V.N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resources Psychology (for example, M.A. Kholodnaya [5] and E.V. Volkova [4]) promotes joint Russian-Belarusian projects. For example, at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, research of cognitive rigidity using an electroencephalograph and an i-tracker was implemented. For this purpose, specialists from the V.N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resources Psychology and the Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Psychology of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow) were invited. The research was conducted within the framework of the concluded Russian-Belarusian Agreement on International Cooperation (February 2023), to which the Institute of Psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University is planned to join [7].
Perspective of international cooperation is seen not only in the field of education, introduction of new technologies, but primarily through the conclusion of contracts for research, development and technological work (R&D).
А.P. Lobanov: dear colleagues, thank you for your contributions. A common consensus is as unattainable as solving the problem of the square of the circle. We have different scientific interests, different facilities, but we are all united by a common cognitive paradigm and the Minsk venue, which is always open for cooperation and exchange of opinions. The conference continues. There are already first responses. “There were raptures and gratitude. It was fantastic: ideas, humor, diversity. Everything was perfectly organized: clear, smooth and quiet. Thank you very much for your work” (Ph.D. in Psychology, docent Elena Medvedskaya). I could not have said it better.
In the first row from left to right is E. V. Volkova, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the V. N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Ability and Mental Resource Psychology at the Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, who participated in the conference through the “Visiting Professor” program; Ph.D. in Pedagogy, Associate Professor at the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia O. B. Mikhailova; Professor of the Department of General and Organizational Psychology, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor A. P. Lobanov; Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Social Psychology at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno A. N. Pevneva. On the second row is O. V. Rudykhina, Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor at the Department of Human Psychology of the State Pedagogical University of Russia named after A. I. Herzen; Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the PsyDATA Center for Comprehensive Support of Psychological Research at Moscow State Pedagogical University N. P. Radchikova; N. V. Drozdova, director of the Institute of psychology of Belarusian State Pedagogical University, candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor; Doctor of Psychology, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Interdepartmental Department of Educational Systems and Pedagogical Technologies of the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation V. A. Yasvin; Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology at Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno K. V. Karpinsky; Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Legal Psychology, Vladivostok State University V. S. Chernyavskaya.
1. Lobanov, A.P. & Drozdova, N.P. “Cognitive Studies”, or Welcome to the Cognitive World // Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 13–15.
2. Lobanov, A.P. & Radchikova N.P. (2023). Cognitive studies: cognitive science and cognitive psychology: Collection of materials of the IX international. scientific-practical conf.; Minsk, May 25–26, 2023; edited by A.P. Lobanova, N.P. Radchikova. Minsk: BSPU, 2023. Issue. 9. 1 electron. wholesale disk (CD-ROM).
3. Lobanov, A.P. & Radchikova N.P. (2023). Cognitive psychology in Belarus: memories of the future // Cognitive studies: cognitive science and cognitive psychology: Collection of materials of the IX international. scientific-practical conf.; Minsk, May 25–26, 2023; edited by A.P. Lobanova, N.P. Radchikova. Minsk: BSPU, 2023. – Issue. 9. – 1 electron. wholesale disk (CD-ROM).
4. Volkova, E.V. & Kuvaeva, I.O. (2023). Coping intelligence of a nation and coping intelligence of a subject: research prospects // Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 42–52.
5. Kholodnaya, М. (2023). The multidimensional nature of reflection: the light and dark sides of reflexive regulation // Vesti BDPU. Seryya 1. No. 2. Р. 63–66.
6. Lobanov, A.Р., Drozdova N.V., Kopteva S.I. (2023). Emotional intelligence and fatigue of future professionals in the assisting professions // Vesti BDPU. Seryya 1. No. 2. Р. 59–62
7. Pevneva, A.N. (2023). Cognitive psychophysical patterns of the Stroop effect in the context of the general concept of rigidity// Adukatsiya i vyhavanne. 7(379). Р. 33–42.